FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [June 2009 Threads] Building Projects with FreeRTOSPosted by jdabbs003 on June 15, 2009 Is FreeRTOS ever linked into a library, or is it just usually built and linked along with the rest of the project?
RE: Building Projects with FreeRTOSPosted by MEdwards on June 16, 2009 Normally linked with the rest of the project, but I don't see why it can't be a library. This proves it http://www.highintegritysystems.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=85&Itemid=93
RE: Building Projects with FreeRTOSPosted by Richard Damon on June 16, 2009 The main reason it isn't done as a library is that a number of the options if FreeRTOSConfig.h affect the generation of the code of the kernel. You can enable/disable a number of features and define the sizes of several items (number of priority levels for example). You could probably fix most of these items (enable all the features you think you might ever need and define "enough" levels for your tasks and be able to build a library, at the cost of increase code and data size for the features you didn't need in a given project.
You would also lose some of the debug features that are enable with macros that add debug code into the kernel.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|