|
|||||||||||||||
FreeRTOS Support ArchiveThe FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
Loading
Scheduler doubtPosted by Nobody/Anonymous on January 11, 2007 Hi When in the Test results you have: Scheduler tick function 66.2μs with optimization. 68.4μs with no optimization. That is the time the secheduler takes to make the context switch between two threads running? regards RE: Scheduler doubtPosted by Richard on January 11, 2007 As described on the WEB site: "The saving and restoration of a task context is not included within the measurement. Each microcontroller requires a different set of registers to be saved meaning a comparison is not directly possible. The PUSH and POP test detailed in the next section can be used as a guide to how efficient the context switch itself may be." Therefore it is the time taken to run the function that selects the task but excluded the push and pop of the context. Regards. RE: Scheduler doubtPosted by Jeff Smith on January 15, 2007 For these vague speed questions, which port are you even talking about? It sounds like you haven't even picked one, so you've got no context, and no wonder you don't know how fast it is. I hope this is not a test question because you're going to miss that one for sure.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||
NXP tweet showing LPC5500 (ARMv8-M Cortex-M33) running FreeRTOS.
Meet Richard Barry and learn about running FreeRTOS on RISC-V at FOSDEM 2019
Version 10.1.1 of the FreeRTOS kernel is available for immediate download. MIT licensed.
View a recording of the "OTA Update Security and Reliability" webinar, presented by TI and AWS.
FreeRTOS and other embedded software careers at AWS.
